🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “complete double standards” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Correspondence acquired by reporters originating from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the country’s government ministers demands proposals to prohibit tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The tobacco firm seeks changes to a proposed legislation that include reductions in the proposed size of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on scented cigarette varieties, and diminished punishments for any companies violating the new laws.

Activist commentary

“Were I in government, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” said Master Chimbala.

Thousands of residents a year pass away from smoking-associated diseases, according to global health agency statistics.

The campaigner stated the letter was believed to have been distributed to various ministerial offices and was in circulation among civil society groups.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

It comes amid expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with health policies. In recent weeks, global health authorities sounded an alarm that the cigarette manufacturers was escalating campaigns to weaken global control measures.

“Evidence exists of corporate influence everywhere. Manufacturer hallmarks are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN summit conference,” said the corporate monitoring director.

Likely impacts

“If a tobacco control measure doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the price could be paid in lives of people who might potentially stop smoking.”

The public health measure being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that graphic health warnings cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Through correspondence, BAT suggests this be reduced to 30% or 50% “according to global guideline limits”, deferred for no less than one year after the bill passes.

International experts in fact recommends a caution must occupy at least half of the front of a pack “and attempt to encompass as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings must cover sixty-five percent of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Scented product controversy

The corporation requests the removal of broad restrictions on flavored cigarette varieties, arguing that it would drive users to “black market” products. The corporation recommends restricting fewer varieties of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The proposed legislation proposes sanctions for multiple violations “ranging from a percentage of annual turnover to ten-year jail sentences”.

Business explanation

Via documentation, the company executive of the African subsidiary claims the firm is “committed to good corporate behaviour” and “endorses the aims of governments to lower tobacco use and the associated health impact” but maintains that “specific rules can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Critic response

The advocate stated the company's suggested modifications would “dilute these regulations so much that the necessary effect for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that many such provisions were present in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “complete contradiction”, he stated.

“We reside in a connected world. When I cultivate smoking products in my property and collect the yield and market the products – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to profit individually and all the future family lines while my neighbor's family are succumbing … is in itself total emotional bankruptcy.”

Tobacco control legislation in the United Kingdom or other countries had not caused companies to close, the advocate mentioned. “Regulations don't close the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Official corporate statement

The company representative said: “The corporation runs its activities following with applicable local laws. Further, the corporation engages in the country’s legislative process in line with the suitable systems which allow for relevant group engagement in legislation creation.”

The firm positioned itself as “not resisting legislation”, the representative commented, mentioning that young individuals should be safeguarded against access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We support evolving legislation to achieve intended community wellbeing objectives, while recognizing the range of entitlements and duties on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the spokesperson stated, noting that the company's suggestions “mirror the circumstances of the African nation's economy and cigarette sector, which includes increasing amounts of illegal commerce”.

The country's office of trade, commerce and industry was contacted for response.